Politics : Award Winning Viewpoints from Liberal Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Tuesday 25 January 2011

God help us?




eton-boys.jpgDoes David Cameron know something we don't? Historical evidence says only a fool would cut public spending in a recession, so the government cut spending. Healthcare systems around the world dominated by the private sector are less, not more, efficient, so they decide to break up the NHS and bring in the private sector. There are hardly any jobs, youth unemployment is a massive problem so why not make it prohibitively expensive to go to university. I have heard of thinking outside the box but we are, it appears, being led by a government that is not tied by any of the philosophical structures of logic or enlightenment thinking.

I must admit, I was confused. After all, these Tory chaps are very well educated. Their parents did not send them to the local comp. No, they wanted them further away than that, so the little Tories were taken from home to be educated. Safely far from home and completely unable to interfere with their parents' busy social lives and careers, all responsibility for their upbringing fell upon the staff of the cleverly spun, public school. You could say that the private sector became mum and dad. Does that explain the strong attachment?

However, by the 1980s times were changing and even absent parents were uncomfortable with the idea of staff  lavishing their children with love and tenderness. Anyway, it was a very expensive extra. Instead the boys were left to learn the importance of relationship building themselves. It was a vital lesson, otherwise they would get beaten up everyday. I'm sure they learnt quickly and it was whilst at school they were able to make friends with whom they would go to Oxford and then work with in forming the government. With such a warm, caring and broad experience of life, it seems utterly baffling that they would pursue such a reckless, uncaring and divisive series of reforms. It's as if these privileged millionaires don't really know what it is like to be out in the real world. Or may be they just need a hug?

Then, it all fell into place. The appointment of Dr Hans-Christian  Raabe to sit on the Advisory Committee on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), was the final piece of the jigsaw. Dr Raabe, a GP, is a member of the Maranatha Community and is medical co-ordinator for the Council for Health and Wholeness (CHW). He also stood for the European Parliament in 2009 for the Christian People's Alliance. The Maranatha Community is a cross denominational movement of Christians,


'We hold fast to the central truths of the Christian faith and strongly affirm the Lordship of Christ and his radical gospel. We are called to bear witness to the truth. Crime, violence, vandalism, corruption, drug abuse, family and marriage collapse, pornography, promiscuity, fear and intolerance are all causing serious fissures in communities across Europe and the West. 

What are the chances that they would disapprove of all of my hobbies? Maranatha means "Our lord has come!" and the Community aims to heal the divisions within Christianity. It appears that they aim to do this by by attacking other religions and minorities within society. I find that there is nothing like hating other people and creating an atmosphere of fear to forge strong bonds. Briefing documents for MPs written on behalf of the CHW have expressed fierce homophobia and suggest that there is an overlap between the gay movement and the movement to make paedophilia acceptable.
  
Raabe's appointment has brought yet more controversy to the ACMD following the resignation of the Chair, Professor David Nutt in 2009. Nutt dared to weigh up the evidence and came up with the wrong answer for the, then, Labour government. Happily, those sort of practices will be a thing of the past. I am very confident that Raabe will not be anything less than subjective. 'Over the past 40 years our culture has embraced post-modernism, which rejects absolute values and standards of truth and promotes the objective of self-gratification.' They're even attacking literary theory and self-gratification. How will I fill my day? A 2005 submission to the government for the CHW, expressed concern that the young were particularly prone to grossly misleading messages - but how else will Churches recruit new members? 
Another group that is campaigning to reassert 'Christian values', is the BNP. Out on the campaign trail and on Question Time, Nick Griffin, has said he represents 'Christian Britain.' "We believe that nations are ordained by God and that they will be there at the end of times, so logically from that all nations have the right to ensure they survive and are not simply swamped by an endless flood from elsewhere." Christian TV has defended its right to provide Griffin with a platform because "The BNP are the only party that would stop abortions in this country. Many Christians abhor abortion." Well, better support the BNP then. Mr Raabe has commented to the Observer, "this is an appointment regarding drug policy and what views I may or may not have on homosexuality are irrelevant." In that case, I look forward to Cameron appointing Griffin to a whole range of government committees that do not deal directly with race.

The appointment got me thinking. Perhaps, David Cameron is better connected than we thought? Why would a Tory appoint someone who opposed his party in an election last year? Why would he think it was such a good idea to appoint a Christian fundamentalist? Obviously, God really is an Englishman, probably an Etonian, and with western civilisation on the brink of collapse, HE, has finally chosen to reveal the true path to financial stability and social coherence. Who'd have ever thought that George Osborne would turn out to be a prophet? Well, the Lord moves in mysterious ways. Was it something written in the stars? Did Cameron have a vision, perhaps he heard voices? Does number ten have a hotline to the Holy Spirit? 

Despite the profound political, social and cultural ramifications that would accompany unarguable proof of the existence of God; at the moment this solution seems more palatable than the alternative; that the Tories are just making it up as they go along and keeping their fingers crossed. So George Michael was right all along, 'You gotta have faith!' Unfortunately, for George, there is a good chance, if the Maranatha and Raabe are correct, Cameron will have to get 'medieval on his ass' - and not in a way that would threaten western civilisation. Think that's funny? Well, they laughed at Joan of Arc, and look where listening to God got her.

We can only hope...

6 comments:

  1. So many things to say and such little time - it is impossible to fathom a government that would do any othe things the tories do, but add them all up and it smacks of not wanting to be in power again (Lib Dems may feel the same way). Pity Labour dont seem to be offering much in the way of oppposition when there is so much to oppose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, but what was this blog about ??? People can believe anything as long as it is not even vaguely Christian? All wishy washy liberals with loose morals can be trusted in public office, but a doctor with a (suposedly) Christian opinion on an unrelated topic can't. What is the country comming to! Christians in public office, it is nearly as twisted as champaigne socialists who comment on common people and what is good for them from inside their half a million pound homes.
    And what, I would like to know, people regard as homophobia, it seems to be a word that is thrown around like confetti. I have met gay devout Chritstians and I have met Christians who don't believe homosexuality is a sin if it sanctified by love. Clearly, hanging around toilets George Michael style, is out for both gay and straight Christians, not that we stone people who engage in this (not any more and not in this country). If however, a Christian chooses to believe that acting on gay urges is sinful, this does not mean they are scared (phobia?) of gay people nor do they hate them etc etc. This is a caricature of Christianity and it's beliefs. So can I be allowed to do a little caricaturing of my own, some people would rather see their kids watching porn than songs of praise! Good title though, God help us indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Teresa,

    I'm not condemning all Christians and previous posts will also prove that. I am condemning this particular obnoxious branch of Christianity. I see no difference between this flavour intolerance and that of the BNP. Yet because his irrational hatred of a particular group is based on religion then Dr R gets a seat on a government committee. That would not happen for the BNP and all these hate mongers should be treated in the same way.

    The article is about faith over reason. I like to have something more than faith to support my assertions. That way I can be persuaded through a logical argument. As a Catholic, how long do you think you would survive in a country run by Protestestant fundamentalists (not this group). I would take the wishy washy liberals if I were you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I just don't know why these small splinter groups of Christianity always get so much attention. And when someone has an extreme view, if he/she is a Christian, it will be blamed on their Christianity rather than on the fact that they, as a person, might (for example) be a bit of a w+=~#r? For instance Priest molesters, emphasis on priest. Other molestors???? We don't know! Has anyone done an analysis on what party molestors vote for? Maybe, in their overwelming majority they vote for Labour. Mind you I don't think that even such a revelation would make some people change the way they vote. I hope this qualifies my statement above and I know full well that you can, on occasion, even be sympathetic to us myth believing, hometerrified (oh how scarry gayness can be), dinosaur denying, abortion abolishing, euthanasia uturning, divorce damning bunch. Ooooooohhh, that was a mouthful.
    To conclude, Joe, never forget that Jesus loves you, yes yes yes, even you!!!!!
    xxxxxxxxxx

    ReplyDelete
  5. Teresa,

    to have faith in one thing is to exclude other things, without recourse to 'peer review', reason or logic. It imposes rather than proves. That is tyranny. That is why religion causes contoversy and 'small splinter groups' get so much attention.

    I suppose that extremists gain attention because they are extremists and the reason that religious groups, not just Christian groups get attention is because there are so many extremists among religious groups.

    As a Christian, take some responsibility and criticise those aspects of Christianity that are against the teachings of Christ.

    This blog attempts to criticise all aspects of politics. Not sure why you think that I am so pro-labour, check out the first few posts that I did. I just realised that the Tories were in govt and changed course.

    From my reading of the New Testament, I suspect Jesus, as the Son of God, loves everyone, isn't that is the point, and that is why Dr R is so wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm afraid the stronger the faith the more it excludes all three of the above, peer review, reason and logic. If the faith is a good interpretation it can lead to marvellous things but if it is bad it can lead to catastrophy. Also you can't have "tyranny" where there is no power to impose. Even mainstream Christianity has become pretty marginalised in England, never mind some new small Evangelical (or whatever they are) group. By the way Joe, it is not your dealings with Christianity that have placed a rather large chip on my shoulder, this is something that has been gnawing away at me at least since Sunday trading was allowed. What the f..k is wrong with a nation that will not fight for it's right (God given and orderded) to have a day off???? I suddenly I felt I was lied to when I came here in '85 thinking it was a Christian country, only to find a few short years after that I am in a marginalised minority that constantly gets picked on for no apparent reason. Madona ( a woman I love to hate) would never have considered selling records based on cheap "controvercy" by dancing half naked in an Islamic place of worship!
    As far as criticising my faith I will not "throw pearls before swine". No I'm not calling you a pig but I will not have that discussion with a person who is not from within or at least actively sympathetic. If this was blog of the Catholic Herald (?) I would be as vociferous as I am now.
    Finally (I'm sure you're glad to hear!), your final two lines are pretty much 100% interpretation. Jesus' statements on the "Son of God" are at best ambiguous. As for "loving everyone", He spoke of laying down your life for your friends and when a non Jewish woman sought healing, He said to her "why should I give the childrens food to the dogs?". How's that for all inclusive??
    All quotes provided are approximate and as close to the original meaning as I can get it. Sorry, I would make a rubbish Evangelical or Jehova's since I have a weak memory and really can't do the old chaprter and verse business.
    Sorry to bore the crap out of everyone!

    ReplyDelete