Politics : Award Winning Viewpoints from Liberal Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Tuesday 14 December 2010

READING THIS COULD BE DANGEROUS


Today Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks who is facing extradition for sexually assualting two women in Sweden, is due to appear in court in London in a fresh attempt to secure bail. Please welcome guest blogger, Kitey, as he gives us a personal view of the scandal.
There is a news story around at the moment that may have escaped your attention – it involves the publication of a few private cables sent by diplomats of the US of A
Julian Assange
This blog does not intend to go into the rights and wrongs of leaking confidential and potentially damaging state documents, although I am in favour of it, but rather the draconian and frankly scary response of America.
There are the usual hang ‘em high brigade that you get in any ‘national crisis’ – Congressman Mike Rogers being a prime example. Congressman Rogers says that execution would be an appropriate punishment for the soldier widely thought to helped leak classified military documents to the whistleblower website WikiLeaks. 
 "I argue the death penalty clearly should be considered here," explained Rogers. "He clearly aided the enemy to what may result in the death of U.S. soldiers or those cooperating. If that is not a capital offense, I don't know what is."
Ex Vice-Presidential hopeful Sarah Palin called for him to be hunted as an “anti-American operative with blood on his hands”, whilst Representative Peter T. King called the leaks “terrorism”.
More sinister is the attempts by the American government to ‘persuade’ various companies that having anything to do with Wikileaks may be harmful for their business.  It is thought that it was US political pressure that provoked Amazon to stop hosting Wikileaks, EveryDNS to break Wikileaks.org’s domain name, eBay/Paypal to stop facilitating financial transactions, Swiss Post to freeze a Wikileaks bank account (in perhaps the first instance in recorded history of a Swiss bank taking residency requirements seriously), and Mastercard and Visa to cease relations. 

The US Government may not have the powers to directly stop the confidential information reaching the public domain but they are doing everything within their power to disrupt and block Wikileaks. Meanwhile, the US Government is content to allow Visa and Mastercard to allow links on the Klu Klux Klan website enabling donations to be made.
Then we get to the very tricky detail of the international arrest warrant for the alleged rape of two Swedish women by the high profile head of Wikileaks, Julian Assange.  I would never support a man accused of such a terrible crime without knowing the facts more thoroughly and I can not comment on his guilt or innocence as I do not know enough about the incident. 
What is striking, of course, is the timing of the warrant.  Mr Assange has stated that he tried to speak to the police in Sweden when the accusation first surfaced but that they thought the evidence was not sufficient to proceed.  He then left Sweden with the knowledge of the police and came to England.  He was not in hiding and British police knew how to contact him. 
Assange's British lawyer says Swedish prosecutor Marianne Ny is flouting international law and staging a "show trial" by keeping him in the dark, calling it "impossible for us to prepare a case if you don't know what the allegations or evidence are." It wasn’t until the leaked cables starting being published that an international arrest warrant was served. This could be a mere coincidence, I will let you draw your own conclusions from that.  What I do hope is the justice is done for the proper reasons rather than any political ones.
Luckily there are many people out there in the cyberworld who believe in the freedom of the internet. From the twitter campaigns aimed at spreading support for Wikileaks, encouraging donations and urging action against the aforementioned companies as well as posting links to the documents themselves, to the sites posting links to Wikileaks to countries who are willing to let them on their servers (Bolivia).  There are also many who are happy to take the law into their own hands and fight fire with fire – apparently Mastercard and Visa sites have been the subject of intense cyber attacks since they announced their decisions.

beauty-and-the-geek.jpg
Beauty and the geek

To me, Wikileaks shows that powerful governments will do anything to keep the truth from the unwashed masses, but, in the digital age, they are fighting a losing battle – and I do believe this battle is part of a bigger war against the ever increasing power of big governments and, sometimes bigger, corporations. Thank goodness for the computer kids who never had girlfriends.

Viva la geek revolucion!

18 comments:

  1. There are two things that worry me about this process.

    Firstly, we are uncovering our own governments' secrets but letting the other bad guys get away with it. Will China or Russia be targetted as well?

    Secondly, the whole Amazon server issue shows just how fragile the freedom of information quality of the internet could be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Devil's Avocado14 December 2010 at 14:04

    I for one, am shocked at your attitude towards such a great country. Where would be without the USofA? Julian Assange should be hauled over the coals for his crimes. Look at him, he's obviously guilty as charged and probably more...
    For more than half a century the greatest nation on the planet had protected us from various evils from Nazi's to Muslim fundamentalists. And what have they asked in return? Think of all that great Hollywood entertainment and fantastic fast food outlets. Without old uncle Sam we'd be watching Coronation Street The Movie with square slabs of tasteless pizza or worse still a tepid Wimpey burger. And it's not just us in the UK who have reaped uncle Sam's benefits. There's the Luftwaffe in WWII, whom without the USofA would never have got their planes in to the air (Rockefeller Foundation). The Koreans, Vietnamese, Cubans, Dominicans, Grenadians, the entire Middle East, Yugoslavians and Afghans have equally been beneficiaries. Without the US intervention I'm sure that the Middle East would be a war zone breeding terror to every nation.
    Its far too easy taking a pop at a Sepi. Lets not forget the great good that they do.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Devils' Avocado comments above: Love it, very funny

    ReplyDelete
  4. re Joe's comment: eh? I think China & Russia come out of the leaks worse than US, even if they are US Govt leaks.

    Horrah for wikileaks! & geeks! Boo to state sponsered terrorism!

    ReplyDelete
  5. why do they write such stuff down? Surely, they should use airtravel more and get together and talk, so there is no proof....
    If they are so stupid as to keep getting caught, they don't deserve to be protected.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm with Avo on this, he does look pretty slimy that Assange bloke. He is clearly guilty of some crime or another. For starters, not visiting his barber often enough. On a more serious note, what can the motivation be for the person who caused the leak????

    ReplyDelete
  7. Was that irony? Wasn't Avo irony?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Agree with the leaks (obviously) so that we can see what countries really think. Think the US reaction says just as much in terms of how insecure they are as a country and how much more important they think their views / morals etc are compared to the rest of the world - unfortunately other countries seem to acquiesce to the US far too easily despite finding out what they really think. Assume cables are being leaked to cause maximum continued embarrassment (only about 1% leaked so far I think). Am waiting for the leaks showing what US thought of the leaks...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes master, both were irony. Don't let them distract you from your lofty thinking with their badly worded digs.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Devil's Avocado14 December 2010 at 17:55

    I've just checked Julian Assange is in fact an anagram of possibly "San-Juan silage", "Nuns a jail age" or "Jungian ale ass" either way he must therefore be iffy and deserves to die.
    God I miss Bush.
    (President that is...)

    ReplyDelete
  11. The Devil's Avocado14 December 2010 at 18:22

    Question: Anyone familiar with this verse?
    "Oh, thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
    Between their loved home and the war's desolation!
    Blest with victory and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land
    Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation!
    Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
    And this be our motto: "In God is our trust"

    Yes Teresa, I'm bringing religion to the table.

    ReplyDelete
  12. so you should my Avocado friend (not miss Bush but bring religion to the table)! I ask again, what was the motivation of the person who leaked?
    If it was the actions of a moral person, a true wistle blower. Is this person doing this out some vindictive evil intention or is he trying to right a wrong?
    In God I trust in deed and in belief.
    An action alone is only part of the truth, the motivation is the whole truth, and that is only known by God and the individual. This why we have confession, for all the the reasons which motivate us but we daren't talk about to others.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The Devil's Avocado15 December 2010 at 09:41

    I thought you had confession because Catholics sin so much

    ReplyDelete
  14. We sin as much as the infidels around us, we are just more aware of doing it!It's a way of keeping self righteousness in check (something you clearly know little about!). Maybe you should try it....I'm all ears!

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Devil's Avocado15 December 2010 at 12:07

    Happily as an atheist I'm free of sin. I therefore have no need of the confessional. Interesting that you consider it necessary to keep "self righteousness" in check. Didn't Jesus condemn self righteousness more than any other sin? I am confused does this mean Catholics are allowed various measures of sin?
    A more modern approach may be that rather than confessing "sins" to a bunch of out of date priests / perverts. We could confess any problems to the society we belong to and hence get help and help said society. Would anyone be prepared to listen? I suggest they would as these blogs attest to.
    Sorry if this come across in anyway self righteously, I ask your forgiveness...

    ReplyDelete
  16. My forgiveness you have, just not my agreement. These priest train for 7 years (or there abouts) to become what they are, and a thousand perverts (priests or otherwise) won't make me think less of the ones who are true to their vows. First point, you are not free of sin, you think you are! Second, confession just as you suggest (and on this we can agree) used to be public and clearly much better for you. Thirdly, it still exists in mass as a communally recited paragraph said before communion. And finally, don't you feel so much better now you got all that off your chest???

    ReplyDelete
  17. Is sin a religious thing or just acting against the laws and moralds of the land. If the former I have no sins as there is no God and therefore no religion to 'sin' against. If the latter then am a happy sinner.

    In this case I don't think the personal motivations of the whistleblower matter to the vast majority who read the leaks. It is the fact that we can see a closer approximation to the true beliefs of the Americans than we have ever had before - and how it differs to their public pronounciations. Keep e'em coming mr Assange.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Crikey, you're right Avocado. That anagram stuff, way iffy. What a clever boy you are!

    ReplyDelete