Some 34% of white Britons believe all immigration into the UK should be stopped permanently. 52% of Britons agree with the proposition "Muslims create problems in the UK", while 63% of white Britons agree with the proposition that "on the whole, immigration into Britain has been a bad thing for the country". In addition, 48% of Britons say they would consider supporting a new far right-wing party, if it shunned violence and fascist imagery.
The statistics have emerged from a Searchlight Educational Trust (SET) poll to explore current attitudes to national identity, religion and race. It is one of the largest surveys to explore these themes with 5054 respondents being asked 91 questions to reveal the level of fear and hate within our society. Formed in 1992 SET is a charity that aims to to provide organisations, groups and individuals with the knowledge and tools to tackle racial hatred. The results of the this report will form the basis for a new SET project Together, which will seek to address these findings.
The Guardian reported,
'These findings will be shocking to many. They shatter many of our liberal preconceptions. And they demonstrate conclusively that when it comes to the narrative of migration and race, our politicians and our community leaders are now running far behind those they seek to represent.'
The report's authors, Nick Lowles and Antony Painter, argue that immigration is creating a new type of politics driven by race and identity. They conclude that Britain is now divided into six 'tribes': Confident Multiculturalists (eight per cent of the population); Mainstream Liberals (16%); Identity Ambivalents (28%); Cultural Integrationists (24%); Latent Hostiles (10%); and Active Enmity (13%). The centre ground, making up 52% of the population, is dominated by Cultural Integrationists who are motived by authority and order; and Identity Ambivalents who are concerned about their economic security and social change.
It seems the more pessimistic individuals are about their future economic prospects, the more inclined they will be to have negative attitudes to immigrants. The 'Identity ambivalents' are seen as the group most likely to be swayed towards the new far-right in the shape of the identity driven groups like the English Defence League. These are either traditional Labour supporters or unaligned voters who feel their concerns were ignored by the Labour Government and are now being further hit by the deep Conservative cuts.
On a more positive note the poll suggested that there was an appetite for mainstream politicians to take on extremism of any kind, Muslim and the far-right were identified as being as bad as each other. However, it warned the mainstream parties that they will have to adjust to the new political culture or face pushing voters towards into the arms of those extremist organisations. Are they the only ones that need to adjust to the changing political culture?
Searchlight magazine was established in 1975 to confront the growth of fascist organisations and to expose racism and anti-semitism across the country. One of the interesting aspects of the poll is the number of minority groups who are also opposed to immigration. Some 39% of Asian Britons and 21% of black Britons now believe: 'all immigration into the UK should be stopped permanently, or at least until the UK's economic situation improves.' A remarkable 43% of Asian Britons and 17% of black Britons agree with the proposition that "on the whole, immigration into Britain has been a bad thing for the country".
Searchlight Educational Trust should be applauded for recognising the influence of economic security, rather than pure innate bigotry, as driving the results. Racism has not disappeared, far from it, but as The Guardian noted Tebbits's cricket test has been replaced by Lowles and Painter's 'means' test. Although it is not expressed in these terms, the report recognises that the hostility to immigration is largely class based. Many people in the lower income groups are feeling the squeeze and immigration is adding to that uncertainty.
Boston |
How many more will there be after the next elections?
Poll findings are notoriously difficult to analyse - what would these individuals views be after being challenged with different questions or with a different system of immigration?. Searchlight have a vested interest in making things look worse than they are.
ReplyDeleteThere are a lot of problems - the mass influx of EU migrants causes chaos for public service planning, whereas asylum refugees are not allowed to work while waiting for a decision - like the mechanic I met from Zimbabwe whose son was killed & he was tortured but has been waiting 8 years for a decision and not been allowed to work.
I support multiculturalism, I think immigration has benefited the country, long may it continue, but the current system is also doing a lot of harm
Eejit, I agree with all your points - They do have a vested interest but I think that Searchlight's full report is more balanced than you would necessarily expect. They note that these results are a snapshot and stress the fluidity in these opinions. I think the recognition that economic insecurity underpins anti-immigration feeling is a huge step in the right direction. We need a more mature debate. At the moment there are too many victims on both sides. The common factors are usually poverty and a lack of a political voice.
ReplyDeleteA large part of the problem stems from the view so readily espoused by politicians & some media that if you are against immigration in any way you are a racist. This stifles debate and leads to resentment building up. We have all seen how this has meant votes for the BNP, the starting of the EDL. The best thing that ever happened to the BNP was letting Nick Griffin on question time. It stopped them saying they never got a chance to debate the issues and showed them up to be the idiots most had suspected. Gordon Browns reaction to the lady in Oldham at the last election also says loads about politicians. Air a grievance re immigration and you are a 'bigot'. Your previos piece on Boston illustrates the problems with a workfrce that is very mobile descending on areas at times of work, moving on to other areas. Not everyone can do that.
ReplyDeleteI have often asked the question of why multicultarism is good - not because I oppose it but because it is an assumption that forms the starting points of a lot of peoples thoughts / arguments on the discussion. Have had some very good answers as well.
The key to this is that their needs to be a proper debate about pros and cons of immigration as well as some real facts - not twisted statistics as are usually peddled in the press
Of course there are pros and cons for both the wider community receiving the individual and for the individual immigrant, but there are difficulties and these are not being addressed by anyone!!! Instead of giving scarce resources to creating statistics that are of limited value, the money should be put to good use and educate new commers to our ways and customs ( and language!!!)
ReplyDeleteOf course racism becomes worse when times are bad, we all look for a "scape goat" (a Biblical expression some of you will not be familiar with), an inocent party to take on the blame of the guilty. The Holocaust would never have happened during good and prosperus times.
The statistics are interesting, but in times like these we need useful things, that go a way to solving a problem not just pose questions about it. This is not a critisism on the blog, rather a general comment on organisations that use a heck of a lot of money to achieve very little!
By the way, in my years of teaching I have never heard of them! Jobs for the boys I guess.
ReplyDeleteKitey, I agree with most of your point. As you say, I think th far right will tie themselves up in knots if you give them a platform - they enjoy the image of being victims and outsiders.
ReplyDeleteThe Boston population is permanently based in the town. I think the interesting thing in Boston is that what has happened to the local politics in Boston is what the Searchlight report predicts could happen across the country with the mainstream parties becoming marginalised. So far the void has been filled by Independents but they could easily be replaced by the EDL.
Denmark and Sweden, traditionally liberal and 'tolerant' countries are having their politics turned upside by EDL style parties.
Teresa, I think the searchlight research is very useful and will underpin further work, that clearly needs to be done. I'm intrigued how you decide what useful things to do without some research.
ReplyDeleteI don't think that fighting the far-right should be described as 'very little'.
As for your holocaust comment - pleased on't get me started on that again.
See, we agree on so much! "Fighting the far right" so we agree that what they do is to a political end. My fight against racism is based on the fact that it is wrong and immoral, which in turn is based on the fact that I believe that we are all God's children and therefore equal in worth.
ReplyDeleteIt is strangely comforting that Boston elects so many independents - of course we don't know what views they hold without stufdying them in more detail as they don't put themselves forward under a broad banner.
ReplyDeleteBNP (and now EDL) will always thrive when there is a percieved lack of opportunity for them to debate thier views - give them enough rope...